Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Zdenek Kotala
Тема Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved)
Дата
Msg-id 451A860E.8080604@sun.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved)  (Kenneth Marshall <ktm@it.is.rice.edu>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane napsal(a):
> Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes:
>> The problem was generated, because -fast option was set only for the 
>> compiler and not for the linker. Linker takes wrong version of 
>> libraries. If   -fast is set for both then horology test is OK, but 
>> question was if float optimalization should generate some problems.
> 
> So FAQ_Solaris needs to tell people to put -fast in both CFLAGS and
> LDFLAGS?

Exactly, but I want to sure, that float optimalization is safe and 
should be applied for postgres, because -fast breaks IEE754 standard. If 
it is OK I will adjust FAQ_Solaris.
Zdenek


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Dave Page"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Buildfarm alarms
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: psql service parameter