Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved)
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 45194D88.2080703@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved)
Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes: > >> But the question is if the "-fast" flag is good for postgres. The -fast >> flag sets "brutal" floating point optimization and some operation should >> have less precision. Is possible verify that floating point operation >> works well? >> > > That's a pretty good way to guarantee that you'll break the datetime > code. > > ! | @ 6 years | @ 5 years 12 mons 5 days 6 hours Doesn't this look odd regardless of what bad results come back from the FP library? cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: