Re: Block B-Tree concept
| От | Heikki Linnakangas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Block B-Tree concept |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 45191EED.2080502@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Block B-Tree concept (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Teodor Sigaev wrote: >> Right now, if an index entry points to a dead tuple, we set a bit in >> the index so future lookups do not access the heap. We could set a >> bit for block index entries that point to a page that has no live >> rows, and >> have vacuum remove the index entry later. > > GIN don't support this feature... I'm only talking about B-trees at this stage. ISTM that you could do the same thing with hash indexes, but I haven't given it much thought. Anyway, I think you'd usually want to use bitmap scans with a Block B-tree, unless you need sorted output. And bitmap scans don't set the LP_DELETE flag either. We might want to do something about that. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: