Re: Update on high concurrency OLTP application and Postgres

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Cosimo Streppone
Тема Re: Update on high concurrency OLTP application and Postgres
Дата
Msg-id 45144C10.2070501@streppone.it
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Update on high concurrency OLTP application and Postgres 8 tuning  (Cosimo Streppone <cosimo@streppone.it>)
Ответы Re: Update on high concurrency OLTP application and Postgres  (Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>)
Список pgsql-performance
Christian Storm wrote:

>>At the moment, my rule of thumb is to check out the ANALYZE VERBOSE
>>messages to see if all table pages are being scanned.
>>
>>   INFO: "mytable": scanned xxx of yyy pages, containing ...
>>
>>If xxx = yyy, then I keep statistics at the current level.
>>When xxx is way less than yyy, I increase the numbers a bit
>>and retry.
>>
>>It's probably primitive, but it seems to work well.
 >
> What heuristic do you use to up the statistics for such a table?

No heuristics, just try and see.
For tables of ~ 10k pages, I set statistics to 100/200.
For ~ 100k pages, I set them to 500 or more.
I don't know the exact relation.

> Once you've changed it, what metric do you use to
 > see if it helps or was effective?

I rerun an analyze and see the results... :-)
If you mean checking the usefulness, I can see it only
under heavy load, if particular db queries run in the order
of a few milliseconds.

If I see normal queries that take longer and longer, or
they even appear in the server's log (> 500 ms), then
I know an analyze is needed, or statistics should be set higher.

--
Cosimo



В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Guido Neitzer"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark"
Следующее
От: Dave Cramer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark"