Re: Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark"
| От | Arjen van der Meijden |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark" |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4513A5EF.7000201@tweakers.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark" (Hannes Dorbath <light@theendofthetunnel.de>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Try the translation ;) http://tweakers.net/reviews/646/13 On 22-9-2006 10:32 Hannes Dorbath wrote: > A colleague pointed me to this site tomorrow: > > http://tweakers.net/reviews/642/13 > > I can't read the language, so can't get a grip on what exactly the > "benchmark" was about. > > Their diagrams show `Request per seconds'. What should that mean? How > many connections PG accepted per second? So they measured the OS fork > performance? Should that value be of any interrest? Anyone with heavy > OLTP workload will use persistent connections or a connection pool in > front. > > Do they mean TPS? That woulnd't make much sense in a CPU benchmark, as > OLTP workload is typically limited by the disc subsystem. > > Can someone enlighten me what this site is about? > >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: