Re: [HACKERS] Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn()

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> In terms of the alternatives I listed previously, it seems like
>> nobody liked alternatives #3, #4, or #5, leaving us with #1 (do
>> nothing) or #2 (apply this patch).  By my count, Peter is the
>> only one in favor of doing nothing, and is outvoted.  I'll push
>> the patch later today if I don't hear additional comments.

> For the record, I also voted for doing nothing.

Hm, well, anybody else want to vote?
        regards, tom lane