Re: Variadic aggregates vs. project policy
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Variadic aggregates vs. project policy |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4510.1377868431@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Variadic aggregates vs. project policy (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Variadic aggregates vs. project policy
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes: > I was one who sent a bug report - this error is not too dangerous, but it > is hidden, and difficult to find, if you don't know what can be happen. > Same as bug with plpgsql and SQL identifier collisions. If you understand, > then you can protect self well and simply. If not, then it is a magic > error. So still I am thing so best solution is > a) a warning when detect ORDER BY in variadic aggregates Such a warning would never be tolerated by users, because it would appear even when the query is perfectly correct. > b) disallow ORDER BY in variadic aggregates in classic syntax, and enable > it only in WITHIN GROUP syntax where is safe , And we're *not* inventing randomly different syntax for variadic aggregates. That ship sailed when we did it this way for regular functions. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: