Tom Lane wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
>> that is the explain for the 4h+ Q9:
>> http://www.kaltenbrunner.cc/files/analyze_q9.txt
>
> The big problem there seems to be the drastic misestimation of the
> number of rows matching the p_name ~~ '%ghost%' condition. What does
> pg_stats have for the p_name column?
http://www.kaltenbrunner.cc/files/pg_stat_p_name.txt
Stefan