Tom Lane wrote:
> The existing geometric containment tests seem to be nonstrict, so if we
> wanted to leave room to add strict ones later, it might be best to
> settle on
>
> x @>= y x contains or equals y
> x <=@ y x is contained in or equals y
>
> reserving @> and <@ for future strict comparison operators.
Since the choice of @> and <@ comes from current ltree operators I'd
like to point out that they are non-strict for ltree, and this could add
a little bit of inconsistence.
Best regards
--
Matteo Beccati
http://phpadsnew.com
http://phppgads.com