Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Dave Cramer wrote:
>> On 31-Aug-06, at 6:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
>>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>>> BTW, are you sure this is coming from JDBC? I see the exact same
>>>>> message text in libpq:
>>>>> libpq_gettext("server sent data (\"D\" message) without prior row
>>>>> description (\"T\" message)\n"));
>>>>> Maybe the JDBC driver uses the identical message wording but my
>>>>> thought is to look for something going through libpq.
>>>> The error is server side. I was just describing the environment.
>>> I can entirely assure you that that error message is not present in
>>> the server code.
>> Well that's even more interesting because it doesn't exist in the
>> jdbc driver either.
>
> Conclusion: they are using libpq in some form, so you should investigate
> that.
>
> Is there a way to alter the tick counter, so that a test run does not
> need to take the full 3 weeks?
>
Sure it is a registry entry... so we could (in theory) shrink that quite
a bit.. However I am confused, if we don't use it, what that is
connecting to libpq would trigger it?
I know they are using pgAAdmin...
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL
solutionssince 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/