Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 44F305B2.9080404@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Böszörményi Zoltán wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> what's the problem with COPY view TO, other than you don't like it? :-) >> > > The problem is that it required a ugly piece of code. Not supporting it > means we can keep the code nice. The previous discussion led to this > conclusion anyway so I don't know why we are debating it again. > > What is so ugly about it? I haven't looked at the code, but I am curious to know. I also don't recall the consensus being quite so clear cut. I guess there is a case for saying that if it's not allowed then you know that "COPY relname TO" is going to be fast. But, code aesthetics aside, the reasons for disallowing it seem a bit thin, to me. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: