I will try to draw all this together today or tomorrow. It's not only
the FAQ that should be patched - the docs and the FAQ should agree with
each other.
In fact, this info arguably belongs in one place only. Which should it be?
cheers
andrew
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I am still waiting for an actual patch to the developer's FAQ for this.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Gregory Stark wrote:
>
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>>
>>
>>> I use more or less what is in the developers' FAQ (not surprising, since I
>>> contributed it). It works just fine for me. See
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ_DEV.html#item1.9
>>>
>>> We should probably bring the docs in line with that, unless someone with more
>>> emacs-fu than me has something to add.
>>>
>> Oh, I've been meaning to email about this. There's a file in the source tree
>> but it's buggy. The code in your FAQ seems ok, but I prefer the way I've done
>> it:
>>
>> (add-hook 'c-mode-hook
>> (function
>> (lambda nil
>> (if (string-match "pgsql" buffer-file-name)
>> (progn
>> (c-set-style "bsd")
>> (setq c-basic-offset 4)
>> (setq tab-width 4)
>> (c-set-offset 'case-label '+)
>> (setq indent-tabs-mode t)
>> )
>> ))))
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gregory Stark
>> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>> match
>>
>
>