Re: Replication
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Replication |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 44E9D3E0.3000008@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Replication (AgentM <agentm@themactionfaction.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
>> >> It is very, very common to have asynchronous replication. I would say >> the need for synchronous is far more limited (although greater desired). > > I would imagine that multi-master synchronous replication would be > fairly trivial to implement with 2PC and wal-shipping available, no? Trivial? I would say... no. There is a reason it hasn't been done yet, and a reason why CMD (for example) has zero plans to even try. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutionssince 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: