Re: Best Procedural Language?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua D. Drake
Тема Re: Best Procedural Language?
Дата
Msg-id 44D03287.5030404@commandprompt.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Best Procedural Language?  ("Carlo Stonebanks" <stonec.register@sympatico.ca>)
Список pgsql-general
Carlo Stonebanks wrote:
> Well, the surprise for me is: this is exactly what I thought! I actually do
> have a lot of string manipulation to do, but I am the only one on the team
> with Tcl experience. For the sake of other developers I thought that the
> plPHP project would be interesting, but I don't get the impression that it
> is as well-developed as plTcl. Does anyone know anything about it?

plPHP is not as mature as plTcl (or is that plTclng). However it is very
well developed and maintained. Heck, companies are even holding talks
and training classes on it now.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake
--

    === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
    Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Best Procedural Language?
Следующее
От: Martijn van Oosterhout
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: LISTEN considered dangerous