Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES]

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joe Conway
Тема Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES]
Дата
Msg-id 44CFBC78.2020508@joeconway.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] 8.2 features?)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] 8.2 features?)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Tom Lane wrote:
> What I'm inclined to do for 8.2 is to disallow OLD/NEW references in
> multi-element VALUES clauses; the feature is still tremendously useful
> without that.

Given the timing, this sounds like a reasonable approach. I agree that 
the feature has lots of interesting uses -- I'd hate to see us lose 
that. Disallowing OLD/NEW references doesn't contradict the spec in any 
way AFAIK either.

Joe

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] 8.2 features?)
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] 8.2 features?)