Re: Time to scale up?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Paul Ramsey
Тема Re: Time to scale up?
Дата
Msg-id 44C6AB82.60100@refractions.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Time to scale up?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: Time to scale up?
Re: Time to scale up?
Re: Time to scale up?
Список pgsql-advocacy
Yes, that's what I mean, only at www.postgresql.org and with integrated
documentation as well as packaging.

The "PostgreSQL is a kernel" metaphor breaks down pretty fast, given
that PostgreSQL sans add-ons is quite useful, to the extent that (as
many many people have previously written) the fact that add-ons even
*exist* is news to lots of PostgreSQL users.  This is not a
misconception someone trying to use "Linux" (just the kernel) would ever
run into.

I think any honest assessment of the "software evaluation experience"
around PostgreSQL would have to admit that (a) people start at the main
PostgreSQL web site and (b) the existence and overall utility of the
various add-ons are pretty well hidden and (c) if they were less well
hidden people might have a better initial impression of the available
capabilities of the overall product.

Pointing out that your site over there does a better job of it does not
make the main site any less unhelpful.

P

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> If we want PostgreSQL to "look bigger" from the outside, it is not
>> necessary to actually *make* it bigger, "looking" bigger is sufficient.
>>
>> Imagine a download page that included:
>>
>> postgresql-database-8.1.4
>> postgresql-replication-1.0.2
>> postgresql-gis-1.1.3
>> postgresql-pooling-1.0.3
>
> You mean like www.mammothpostgresql.org?
>
> As mentioned previously. PostgreSQL is similar to a kernel. It is not a
> distribution.
>
>
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>


В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Marc G. Fournier"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgsql-www] Time to scale up?
Следующее
От: Paul Ramsey
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Time to scale up?