Re: effective_cache_size is a real?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: effective_cache_size is a real?
Дата
Msg-id 44C55771.2080206@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на effective_cache_size is a real?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter,

> Is it intentional that effective_cache_size is a real (as opposed to 
> integer)?  The initial revision of guc.c already has it that way, so it 
> was probably blindly adapted from the previous adhockery that had all 
> planner variables be doubles.
> 

I beleive that it's a real because the other query estimate variables 
are reals.  Might be worth checking the estimation code to make sure 
that changing the type won't break anything.

--Josh


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Fwd: dblink patch - Asynchronous queries and parallel
Следующее
От: Chris Browne
Дата:
Сообщение: Help! - Slony-I - saving/setting/restoring GUC