Re: Forcing wal rotation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Florian G. Pflug
Тема Re: Forcing wal rotation
Дата
Msg-id 44B7BEFE.6090406@phlo.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Forcing wal rotation  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 05:36:58PM +0200, Florian G. Pflug wrote:
>> That was the idea - providing pg_rotate_wal(), which would guarantee that
>> the wal is rotatted at least once if called. Thinking further about this,
>> for a first prove of concept, I'd be enough to write a C function
>> pg_current_walsegment(). pg_rotate_wal() could then be a plpgsql function,
>> that e.g. creates a temporary table, and fills it with data, until the
>> return value of pg_current_walsegment() changes.
> 
> Temporary tables don't get xlogged. It would probably be easier to hook
> into the xlog machinery and create NOP records, like you originally
> suggested.
From further sourcecode reading, I got the following implementation plan
.) Add new entry to RmgrTable (Should I add it at the end, or use one of the "reserved" entries?)
.) Create nop_redo and nop_desc - for nop_redo an empty function should be sufficient
.) Create pg_rotate_wal, which calls   XLogInsert(RM_NOP_ID, XLOG_NO_TRAN, rdata)   with     rdata.data = "pointer to
WAL_SEGMENT_SIZEzero bytes"     rdata.len = WAL_SEGMENT_SIZE     rdata.buffer = InvalidBuffer     rdata.next = NULL
 

Since I insert WAL_SIZE bytes, I shouldn't even have to loop, because that records
has no chance to fit into the current wal segment, right?

Am I overlooking something?

greetings, Florian Pflug



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Martijn van Oosterhout
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Forcing wal rotation
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: contrib promotion?