On 6/7/2006 4:34 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca> writes:
>> > At the same time, it strikes me that at least the userlock stuff, and
>> > maybe dbmirror as well, are candidates for pgfoundry rather than
>> > contrib/
>>
>> We'd already agreed to move dbmirror to pgfoundry, but it just didn't
>> get done for 8.1. I had not thought of pgfoundry as a reasonable
>> solution for userlock, but maybe that's the best thing to do with it.
>>
>> A better idea would be to contact the module authors and get them to
>> relicense, but that might be hard. Dal Zotto at least hasn't been
>> seen on these lists for a long time :-(
>
> Here is the most recent feedback we have from Massimo:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2001-08/msg01001.php
>
> > Regarding the licencing of the code, I always release my code under GPL,
> > which is the licence I prefer, but my code in the backend is obviously
> > released under the original postgres licence. Since the module is loaded
> > dynamically and not linked into the backend I don't see a problem here.
> > If the licence becomes a problem I can easily change it, but I prefer the
> > GPL if possible.
>
Which means thus far he did not agree to the license change. Can we just
move the stuff over to pgfoundry and be done with it?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #