Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua D. Drake
Тема Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
Дата
Msg-id 448E11B1.20309@commandprompt.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?  (Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>)
Ответы Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
Список pgsql-performance
> Empirically... postgresql built for 64 bits is marginally slower than
> that built
> for a 32 bit api on sparc. None of my customers have found 64 bit x86
> systems to be suitable for production use, yet, so I've not tested on any
> of those architectures.

Really? All of our customers are migrating to Opteron and I have many
that have been using Opteron for over 12 months happily.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> Cheers,
>   Steve
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
>               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>


--

             === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
       Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
       Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
                      http://www.commandprompt.com/



В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bill Moran
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
Следующее
От: Steve Atkins
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?