Tom Lane wrote:
> "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
>> your time of 150 ms is looking like the slow case on my results.
>
> Yeah... so what's wrong with my test? Anyone else care to duplicate
> the test and see what they get?
Using your test [generating c from int(rand(1000))], I get 230 ms using
5.0.18 on a P3 1000 Mhz (doing optimize table on t made no difference at
all).
Cheers
Mark