Re: Better to dump tabs as tabs, or \t?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Better to dump tabs as tabs, or \t? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4478B31D.9050907@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Better to dump tabs as tabs, or \t? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Historically pg_dump has taken pains to dump ASCII control characters > as backslash constructs, for instance \t for tab. I am thinking this > is not such a great idea, and that it'd be more portable rather than > less so if we got rid of that logic and just dumped tab as tab, etc. > In particular, making this play nice with standard_conforming_strings > seems unpleasant: we'll have to emit E'' strings which are certainly > not portable, not even to older PG releases. > > The only good argument I can see for the current behavior is that it > makes the dump file somewhat more robust against whitespace-mashing > filters like typical email programs. But I wouldn't count on a > dump file to come through such a thing completely unscathed anyway. > > > Go for it. Emailing a database dump as other than a properly encoded MIME attachment makes no sense these days. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: