Re: Instability in partition_prune test?

David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> The attached basically adds:
> set max_parallel_workers = 0;

It seems quite silly to be asking for a parallel plan and then insisting
it not run in parallel.

Maybe the right solution is to strip out the loop_count from what's
printed.  We've already done that sort of thing in at least one other
test, using some plpgsql code to "sed" the EXPLAIN output.

            regards, tom lane