Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?)

Tom Lane wrote:

> I think the hard part of this task is designing the API for access to
> the rowsets from triggers.
> 
My preference would be something similar to two Portal instances (the NEW and OLD). I could 
then map it in the same way that I map the result of a query. If the API actually used two 
real Portal instances, the PL/Java implementation would take minutes.

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren