Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Christopher Kings-Lynne
Тема Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Дата
Msg-id 446D205C.9060306@calorieking.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
Ответы Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Список pgsql-hackers
> And MySQL is much closer to being a competitor now than they were in
> 4.1. And feature-wise they'll probably equal PostgreSQL in the next
> release. Will the features be anywhere near as robust or well thought
> out? No. But in a heck of a lot of companies that doesn't matter.

Don't forget that they got nested transactions and PITR both before us.  They will also shortly have really nice
partitioningbefore us...
 

...don't underestimate their development speed.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: text_position worst case runtime
Следующее
От: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?