Re: Age function

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Berend Tober
Тема Re: Age function
Дата
Msg-id 446B3216.30209@seaworthysys.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Age function  (Alban Hertroys <alban@magproductions.nl>)
Ответы Re: Age function  (Alban Hertroys <alban@magproductions.nl>)
Список pgsql-general
Alban Hertroys wrote:

 > Look here:
 >
 > template1=> select age(now() + '01:30:00'::interval);
 >        age
 > ------------------
 >  -17:02:41.247957
 > (1 row)
 >
 > So, One and a half hour in the future is actually 17 days ago?
 > Interesting... Either I am doing something wrong, or postgres is, I have
 > my suspicions ;)

<good-natured sarcasm>Your suspicions are correct that you are doing, or
rather, understanding  something incorrectly. </good-natured sarcasm>

First of all, the "17" is hours, not days. Look again at the formatted
output.

Secondly, there are two forms of AGE, taking, respectively two arguments
and one argument. The latter is a shorthand for the former, assuming the
current time as the base time. So in your query is equivalent to

('2006-05-17 00:00:00') - ('2006-05-17 10:02:01.727674-04' + '01:30:00')

(my current time, 10:02:01.727674-04, is different from what yours was,
obviously)

Looking that the output from :

select
    age(now() + '01:30:00'::interval),
    now(),
    current_date::timestamp,
    current_time,
    age(current_date, now() + '01:30:00'::interval),
    age(now() + '01:30:00'::interval, current_date),
    age(now() + '01:30:00'::interval, now())


might help, <professorial pontification>as would RTFM
("http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/functions-datetime.html",
Table 9-26. Date/Time Functions). </professorial pontification>

Regards,
Berend Tober

Вложения

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Christian Kratzer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: GUI Interface
Следующее
От: "Dave Page"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: GUI Interface