Re: possible bug in SELECT with UNION
| От | Dario Basso Cardoso |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: possible bug in SELECT with UNION |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 44649E5C.2010902@itelefonica.com.br обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: possible bug in SELECT with UNION (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Thank you With UNION ALL the SQL work correct for my case... Dario. Tom Lane escreveu: >Dario Basso Cardoso <cardosodario@itelefonica.com.br> writes: > > >>I receive two (2) rows if i union with other table i receive one (1) row!!! >> >> > >You do know that UNION is defined to eliminate duplicate output rows? >(UNION ALL doesn't eliminate duplicates, and might be what you want.) > >If that's not what you're seeing then you need to provide more info. > > regards, tom lane > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > > > >
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: