Kris Jurka wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
>
>> Kris Jurka wrote:
>>
>>> Anyway the test exits with
>>> Stuck spinlock (80618e9) detected at ./s_lock.c:355.
>>>
>>> on a linux gcc build this exits with
>>> Stuck spinlock (0x5013ad) detected at ./s_lock.c:402.
>>
>>
>> This seems like a different problem, no? The patch I sent in didn't
>> touch any of the linux assembly bits. The linux test should pass to
>> the end without an issue right?
>>
>
> No, that's the desired ending. It prints:
>
> S_LOCK_TEST: this will print 1000 stars and then
> exit with a 'stuck spinlock' message
> if S_LOCK() and TAS() are working.
>
> The solaris version is just getting stuck before at another point before
> the expected stuck point.
My workstation is running 32bit solaris.. I can build and debug it
here... I'll give that a spin (hehe).
--
// Theo Schlossnagle
// Principal Engineer -- http://www.omniti.com/~jesus/
// Ecelerity: Run with it. -- http://www.omniti.com/