Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 2.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Teodor Sigaev
Тема Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 2.
Дата
Msg-id 444F9767.2040605@sigaev.ru
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 2.  (Jeremy Drake <pgsql@jdrake.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> I just built this, and noticed that the regression test for "opr_sanity"
> fails with your patch.  I attached the regression.diffs.

Sorry, this part isn't done yet, because we are waiting of community decision..
We don't add regression test yet.

If community don't like to include GIN in core, we make a contrib/gin, but in 
this case GIN can't use WAL feature because of WAL interface can't call 
user-defined function.

The reason for first diff is a hardcoded 'gist' index: -- We have to exclude GiST, unfortunately, since it hasn't got
anyfixed
 
-- requirements about strategy operators.

SELECT p1.oid, p1.amname, p2.oid, p2.opcname, p3.amopsubtype
FROM pg_am AS p1, pg_opclass AS p2, pg_amop AS p3
WHERE p2.opcamid = p1.oid AND p3.amopclaid = p2.oid AND    p1.amname != 'gist' AND    p1.amstrategies != (SELECT
count(*)FROM pg_amop AS p4                        WHERE p4.amopclaid = p2.oid AND
p4.amopsubtype= p3.amopsubtype);
 



Second is right diff.

For the thread one  reason is that operations &&, ~, @ defined for anyarray, but 
used for particular types.

> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> *** ./expected/opr_sanity.out    Wed Jan 25 18:35:51 2006
> --- ./results/opr_sanity.out    Wed Apr 26 08:31:13 2006
> ***************
> *** 778,785 ****
>                           WHERE p4.amopclaid = p2.oid AND
>                                 p4.amopsubtype = p3.amopsubtype);
>    oid | amname | oid | opcname | amopsubtype 
> ! -----+--------+-----+---------+-------------
> ! (0 rows)
>   
>   -- Check that amopopr points at a reasonable-looking operator, ie a binary
>   -- operator yielding boolean.
> --- 778,791 ----
>                           WHERE p4.amopclaid = p2.oid AND
>                                 p4.amopsubtype = p3.amopsubtype);
>    oid  | amname | oid  |  opcname  | amopsubtype 
> ! ------+--------+------+-----------+-------------
> !  2742 | gin    | 2745 | _int4_ops |           0
> !  2742 | gin    | 2745 | _int4_ops |           0
> !  2742 | gin    | 2745 | _int4_ops |           0
> !  2742 | gin    | 2746 | _text_ops |           0
> !  2742 | gin    | 2746 | _text_ops |           0
> !  2742 | gin    | 2746 | _text_ops |           0
> ! (6 rows)
>   
>   -- Check that amopopr points at a reasonable-looking operator, ie a binary
>   -- operator yielding boolean.
> ***************
> *** 825,831 ****
>        783 |           10 | <<|
>        783 |           11 | |>>
>        783 |           12 | |&>
> ! (24 rows)
>   
>   -- Check that all operators linked to by opclass entries have selectivity
>   -- estimators.  This is not absolutely required, but it seems a reasonable
> --- 831,840 ----
>        783 |           10 | <<|
>        783 |           11 | |>>
>        783 |           12 | |&>
> !     2742 |            1 | &&
> !     2742 |            2 | @
> !     2742 |            3 | ~
> ! (27 rows)
>   
>   -- Check that all operators linked to by opclass entries have selectivity
>   -- estimators.  This is not absolutely required, but it seems a reasonable
> ***************
> *** 847,854 ****
>   WHERE p1.amopopr = p2.oid AND p1.amopclaid = p3.oid AND
>       NOT binary_coercible(p3.opcintype, p2.oprleft);
>    amopclaid | amopopr | oid | oprname | opcname 
> ! -----------+---------+-----+---------+---------
> ! (0 rows)
>   
>   SELECT p1.amopclaid, p1.amopopr, p2.oid, p2.oprname, p3.opcname
>   FROM pg_amop AS p1, pg_operator AS p2, pg_opclass AS p3
> --- 856,869 ----
>   WHERE p1.amopopr = p2.oid AND p1.amopclaid = p3.oid AND
>       NOT binary_coercible(p3.opcintype, p2.oprleft);
>    amopclaid | amopopr | oid  | oprname |  opcname  
> ! -----------+---------+------+---------+-----------
> !       2746 |    2750 | 2750 | &&      | _text_ops
> !       2745 |    2750 | 2750 | &&      | _int4_ops
> !       2746 |    2751 | 2751 | @       | _text_ops
> !       2745 |    2751 | 2751 | @       | _int4_ops
> !       2746 |    2752 | 2752 | ~       | _text_ops
> !       2745 |    2752 | 2752 | ~       | _int4_ops
> ! (6 rows)
>   
>   SELECT p1.amopclaid, p1.amopopr, p2.oid, p2.oprname, p3.opcname
>   FROM pg_amop AS p1, pg_operator AS p2, pg_opclass AS p3
> 
> ======================================================================
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

-- 
Teodor Sigaev                                   E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
  WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeremy Drake
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 2.
Следующее
От: Gevik Babakhani
Дата:
Сообщение: Regarding TODO item "%Add a separate TRUNCATE permission"