Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
| От | David Boreham |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 444F870D.2000307@boreham.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs (William Yu <wyu@talisys.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
>While in general there may not be that much of a % difference between the 2 chips, >there's a huge gap in Postgres. For whatever reason, Postgres likes Opterons. >Way more than Intel P4-architecture chips. It isn't only Postgres. I work on a number of other server applications that also run much faster on Opterons than the published benchmark figures would suggest they should. They're all compiled with gcc4, so possibly there's a compiler issue. I don't run Windows on any of our Opteron boxes so I can't easily compare using the MS compiler.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: