Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Boreham
Тема Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Дата
Msg-id 444F870D.2000307@boreham.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs  (William Yu <wyu@talisys.com>)
Ответы Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs  (PFC <lists@peufeu.com>)
Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs  (William Yu <wyu@talisys.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
 >While in general there may not be that much of a % difference between
the 2 chips,
 >there's a huge gap in Postgres. For whatever reason, Postgres likes
Opterons.
 >Way more than Intel P4-architecture chips.

It isn't only Postgres. I work on a number of other server applications
that also run much faster on Opterons than the published benchmark
figures would suggest they should. They're all compiled with gcc4,
so possibly there's a compiler issue. I don't run Windows on any
of our Opteron boxes so I can't easily compare using the MS compiler.





В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Junaili Lie"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: slow deletes on pgsql 7.4
Следующее
От: Michael Stone
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Introducing a new linux readahead framework