Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 444E8DD8.3040504@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs (David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
David Boreham wrote:
>
>> Actually, that was from an article from this last month that compared
>> the dual core intel to the amd. for every dollar spent on the intel,
>> you got about half the performance of the amd. Not bigotry. fact.
>>
>> But don't believe me or the other people who've seen the difference. Go
>> buy the Intel box. No skin off my back.
>>
> I've been doing plenty of performance evaluation on a parallel application
> we're developing here : on Dual Core Opterons, P4, P4D. I can say that
> the Opterons open up a can of wupass on the Intel processors. Almost 2x
> the performance on our application vs. what the SpecCPU numbers would
> suggest.
Because Stone Cold Said So!
>
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: