Re: GiST index slower than seqscan
| От | Teodor Sigaev |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: GiST index slower than seqscan |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4448E439.2010900@sigaev.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: GiST index slower than seqscan (CG <cgg007@yahoo.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
> When I said full text, I meant substring. Please correct me if I am wrong, but
> tsearch would be useful for finding words in a paragraph, not characters in a
> word (or small group of words) ... If I had fields 'Hello World!', 'Low Tide',
> and 'Following Day' they would all be hits for a search on 'low' ...
>
Ok, I see
> I bet you meant ltree/ltree.h ... I'll give that a try and see what happens!
> Thank you!
Ltree index structure is mixed by BTree and signature tree. You don't need Btree
part as I understand...
I don't know efficient index structure to support queries you want... May be
Oleg knows...
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: