Re: Checking assumptions

> I havn't been able to find any more serious issues in the Coverity
> report, now that they've fixed the ereport() issue. A number of the
> issues it complains about are things we already Assert() for. For the
> rest, as long as the following assumptions are true we're done (well,
> except for ECPG). I think they are true but it's always good to check:

Everytime someone does this, we fix everything except ECPG.  Surely it's 
time we fixed ECPG as well?

Chris