Re: GiST index slower than seqscan

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Teodor Sigaev
Тема Re: GiST index slower than seqscan
Дата
Msg-id 444820BB.9090007@sigaev.ru
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на GiST index slower than seqscan  (CG <cgg007@yahoo.com>)
Ответы Re: GiST index slower than seqscan  (CG <cgg007@yahoo.com>)
Список pgsql-general
> In case you're unfamiliar with this particular horse, I'm using ltree to create
> a full text index on some <= 50 char long fields for a lookup table. The idea
> was to be able to tear through tons of data quickly finding case insensitive
> substring matches.
>

Why it is a ltree, not a tsearch?


>          Index Cond: (search_vector ~ '*.6.6.9.3.4.4.*'::lquery)

That's the problem. Queries which begin with '*' will be slow enough...



Try to reduce SIGLENINT in tsearch2/gistidx.h up to 8 (do not forget reindex !!)
and try it....

--
Teodor Sigaev                                   E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
                                                    WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Teodor Sigaev
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: full text search: the concept of a "word"
Следующее
От: Agent M
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: sudo-like behavior