Re: plpgsql by default

Andrew - Supernews wrote:
> On 2006-04-11, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I don't feel a need to offer specific examples as requested by Andrew.
> 
> Why not? You're basing your entire argument on a false premise (that
> pl/pgsql is more powerful than SQL); I can provide specific examples of
> why this is not the case, or refute any that you care to provide. 

You can write trigger functions in plpgsql.

--   Richard Huxton  Archonet Ltd