Re: count(*) performance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Gábriel Ákos
Тема Re: count(*) performance
Дата
Msg-id 44282D45.7020008@i-logic.hu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: count(*) performance  ("Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>)
Ответы Re: count(*) performance
Re: count(*) performance
Список pgsql-performance
Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Gabriel,
>
> On 3/27/06 10:05 AM, "Gábriel Ákos" <akos.gabriel@i-logic.hu> wrote:
>
>> That gave me an idea. I thought that autovacuum is doing it right, but I
>> issued a vacuum full analyze verbose , and it worked all the day.
>> After that I've tweaked memory settings a bit too (more fsm_pages)
>
> Oops! I replied to your disk speed before I saw this.
>
> The only thing is - you probably don't want to do a "vacuum full", but
> rather a simple "vacuum" should be enough.

I thought that too. Autovacuum is running on our system but it didn't do
the trick. Anyway the issue is solved, thank you all for helping. :)


--
Üdvözlettel,
Gábriel Ákos
-=E-Mail :akos.gabriel@i-logic.hu|Web:  http://www.i-logic.hu=-
-=Tel/fax:+3612367353            |Mobil:+36209278894            =-

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Luke Lonergan"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: count(*) performance
Следующее
От: george young
Дата:
Сообщение: simple join uses indexes, very slow