Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 2:18 PM Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:

On 04.02.2019 8:35, Michael Paquier wrote:
This patch set needs a rebase because of conflicts caused by the
recent patches for pluggable storage.

Hi Nikita,
From the department of trivialities: according to cfbot the
documentation doesn't build.  Looks like you have some cases of </>,
but these days you have to write out </quote> (or whatever) in full.

Sorry, tags in docs were fixed.  Also I fixed list of data types with built-in
distance operators and list of assumptions for btree distance operators.

Attached 7th version the patches (only documentation was changed).

--
Nikita Glukhov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company