Re: Foreign keys for non-default datatypes

Stephan Szabo wrote:

>On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>  
>
>>The reason I'm hesitant to add a bunch more cross-type operators is
>>mainly that we have too darn many operators named "=" already.  I've
>>seen in recent profiling tests that it's taking the parser a noticeable
>>amount of time to decide which one is meant. 
>>

Speaking of parsers, did anyone else notice that gcc in its latest 
release has ripped out the bison based parser for C and Objective-C in 
favor of a hand cut RD parser?

cheers

andrew