Re: constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance

Andrew,

> How fine-grained do we want to get on namespaces? I'd be slightly more 
> inclined to have pg_info or maybe pg_utils as a place to stash not only 
> extra system views but other utility stuff that we want to ship but is 
> essentially droppable.

AFAIK, none of the contributors to newsysviews has any attachment to any 
particular name.  I'd personally prefer to go with your suggestion of a 
more generic schema name.

--Josh