Re: Dubious usage of TYPCATEGORY_STRING

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Dubious usage of TYPCATEGORY_STRING
Дата
Msg-id 43d84b1f-0baf-f458-b75a-f16f021900c4@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Dubious usage of TYPCATEGORY_STRING  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Dubious usage of TYPCATEGORY_STRING  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 07.12.21 21:24, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut<peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>  writes:
>>> Could we add explicit casts (like polcmd::text) here?  Or would it break
>>> too much?
>> I assumed it'd break too much to consider doing that.  But I suppose
>> that since a typcategory change would be initdb-forcing anyway, maybe
>> it's not out of the question.  I'll investigate and see exactly how
>> many places would need an explicit cast.
> Um, I definitely gave up too easily there.  The one usage in \dp
> seems to be the*only*  thing that breaks in describe.c, and pg_dump
> doesn't need any changes so far as check-world reveals.  So let's
> just move "char" to another category, as attached.

Looks good to me.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Post-CVE Wishlist
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Non-superuser subscription owners