Re: Raising the Pl/Perl required version
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Raising the Pl/Perl required version |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 43EE463F.8060604@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Raising the Pl/Perl required version ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
See here: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-10/msg00438.php I don't mind requiring 5.6, but I do want to think carefully about the implications of changing the declaration of $_TD from "my" to "our", especially if multiple triggers fire. Is there a danger we might clobber one? cheers andrew Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > >This was raised before, but I can't find the exact thread. I'd >like to re-open the idea of boosting the minimum Perl version >for PL/Perl to 5.6. My primary motivation is to provide use >of "our" for the %TD hash, as mentioned before (cannot find the >email right now). Being as 5.6 was released nearly six years >ago, in March of 2000, I'm hoping that this won't meet too many >objections. > > > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: