Re: solving wraparound

> Anyone think it might be reasonable to add a GUC option that tells
> autovacuum to monitor for wraparound only, and not for more general
> usage based vacuuming?  Something like autovac_wraparound_only.  Not
> sure I like the idea, but thought it might be worth some discussion.

I believe 8.1 will actually stop allowing transactions if a wraparound
is going to occur.

Joshua D. Drake


>
> Matt
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
>               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq