Re: pgsql: Update why unified diff is _sometimes_ better.
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pgsql: Update why unified diff is _sometimes_ better. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 43AD9C19.2040309@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | pgsql: Update why unified diff is _sometimes_ better. (momjian@postgresql.org (Bruce Momjian)) |
| Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Update why unified diff is _sometimes_ better.
|
| Список | pgsql-committers |
spelling error: s/surrouding/surrounding/ cheers andrew Bruce Momjian wrote: >Log Message: >----------- >Update why unified diff is _sometimes_ better. > >Modified Files: >-------------- > pgsql/doc: > FAQ_DEV (r1.102 -> r1.103) > (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/FAQ_DEV.diff?r1=1.102&r2=1.103) > pgsql/doc/src/FAQ: > FAQ_DEV.html (r1.105 -> r1.106) > (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/src/FAQ/FAQ_DEV.html.diff?r1=1.105&r2=1.106) > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match > > >
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: