Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1
| От | Alan Stange |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 43A81CE0.7060805@rentec.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1 ("Jignesh K. Shah" <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Jignesh K. Shah wrote: > I guess it depends on what you term as your metric for measurement. > If it is just one query execution time .. It may not be the best on > UltraSPARC T1. > But if you have more than 8 complex queries running simultaneously, > UltraSPARC T1 can do well compared comparatively provided the > application can scale also along with it. I just want to clarify one issue here. It's my understanding that the 8-core, 4 hardware thread (known as strands) system is seen as a 32 cpu system by Solaris. So, one could have up to 32 postgresql processes running in parallel on the current systems (assuming the application can scale). -- Alan
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: