Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink
От | MauMau |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 43A3F17A96F245BF8E81C8580BE4107B@maumau обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> > In the first query, the MemoryContextReset is nearly free since there's > nothing to free (and we've special-cased that path in aset.c). It's > certainly a measurement artifact that it measures out faster, which says > to me that these numbers can only be trusted within a couple percent; > but at least we're not taking much hit in cases where the patch isn't > actually conferring any benefit. For the second query, losing 1% to avoid > memory bloat seems well worthwhile. > > Barring objections I'll apply and back-patch this. So this patch would solve memory leak issues if other modules had similar bugs, in addition to the original dblink problem, wouldn't this? Definitely +1. The original OP wants to use 9.2. I'll report to him when you've committed this nce patch. Thanks, Tom san. Regards MauMau
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: