Re: Regression test horology failure
| От | Michael Paesold |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Regression test horology failure |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 439F2635.7010700@gmx.at обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Regression test horology failure (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane schrieb: > "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold@gmx.at> writes: > >>The tests fail for PST/PDT in 2034. > > > This probably indicates that you've got TZ data reflecting the new US > DST rules. We have not updated the pre-8.0 regression test results > to deal with that. You're right as far as I can tell. 8.1 has the expected output. The failing tests are different instances of this basic example: Expected: Wed Mar 15 08:14:01 2000 PST + 34 years = Wed Mar 15 08:14:01 2034 PST Here (and PostgreSQL >= 8.x): Wed Mar 15 08:14:01 2000 PST + 34 years = Wed Mar 15 08:14:01 2034 PDT Still, I don't understand why March 15th should be day light saving time. But hey, I don't live in the PST8PDT time zone. ;-) Thanks for your answer. Best Regards, Michael Paesold
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: