Re: Schema bug

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Florian G. Pflug
Тема Re: Schema bug
Дата
Msg-id 439E07BD.1060504@phlo.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Schema bug  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
Ответы Re: Schema bug  ("Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>)
Список pgadmin-hackers
Andreas Pflug wrote:
 > Florian G. Pflug wrote:
 >> I'd prefer system-catalogs being excluded by name - preferably the
 >> exclusion-list would be editable, and part of the pgadmin preferences.
 >> Seems more transparent to me - and future-proof, in the sense that
 >> even if a future postgres version chooses to rename some catalog, the
 >> user will be able to just add the new names to the exclusion list.
 >
 > There's already a database restriction and a schema restriction, just
 > use it.
Ups... Should have checked before posting... Doesn't invalidate my
point, though ;-)

BTW, I just checked the postgresql CVS, and found the in the beginnings
of schema-support in pgsql, the public schema had oid 2071. It got
changed to 2200 before 7.3 was released, though.

greetings, Florian Pflug

В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andreas Pflug
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Schema bug
Следующее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Schema bug