Re: Query not using index

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kaloyan Iliev
Тема Re: Query not using index
Дата
Msg-id 4399B312.2080907@mbox.digsys.bg
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Query not using index  (Kaloyan Iliev <news1@faith.digsys.bg>)
Список pgsql-performance
Hi all,
Thanks for the reply. I made some more test and find out that the
problem is with the <<= operator for the network type. Can I create
index which to work with <<=. Because if I use = the index is used. But
not for <<=.
iplog=# explain analyze SELECT *
iplog-#                                    FROM croute
iplog-#                                    WHERE '193.68.0.10/32' <<=
network;
                                               QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Seq Scan on croute  (cost=0.00..707.27 rows=4891 width=103) (actual
time=10.313..29.621 rows=2 loops=1)
   Filter: ('193.68.0.10/32'::cidr <<= network)
 Total runtime: 29.729 ms
(3 rows)

iplog=# explain analyze SELECT *
iplog-#                                    FROM croute
iplog-#                                    WHERE '193.68.0.10/32' = network;
                                                           QUERY PLAN

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Index Scan using croute_network_all on croute  (cost=0.00..17.99 rows=4
width=103) (actual time=0.053..0.059 rows=1 loops=1)
   Index Cond: ('193.68.0.10/32'::cidr = network)
 Total runtime: 0.167 ms
(3 rows)

Waiting for replies.

Thanks to all in advance.

Kaloyan Iliev

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pål Stenslet
Дата:
Сообщение: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex multidimensional query?
Следующее
От: Michael Fuhr
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: How much expensive are row level statistics?