Re: Oddity with extract microseconds?
| От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 439650F1.4050901@familyhealth.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> mysql> SELECT EXTRACT(MICROSECOND FROM '2003-01-02 10:30:01.00123'); > +-------------------------------------------------------+ > | EXTRACT(MICROSECOND FROM '2003-01-02 10:30:01.00123') | > +-------------------------------------------------------+ > | 1230 | > +-------------------------------------------------------+ > 1 row in set (0.00 sec) > > Does contrary behavior from MySQL count as evidence that PostgreSQL's > behavior is correct? :-) No...I happen to think that their way is more consistent though. Pity it's not in the spec. At least PostgreSQL is consistent with seconds/microseconds: mysql=# select extract(seconds from timestamp '2005-01-01 00:00:01.01'); date_part ----------- 1.01 (1 row) Chris
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: