Re: Very Large Table Partitioning

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Very Large Table Partitioning
Дата
Msg-id 4393.1292614729@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Very Large Table Partitioning  (Majid Azimi <majid.merkava@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Very Large Table Partitioning  (Mladen Gogala <mladen.gogala@vmsinfo.com>)
Список pgsql-novice
Majid Azimi <majid.merkava@gmail.com> writes:
> if we decide to partition table per user we have lots of tables (maybe
> more than 100000+) with only 10000 records each.
> is this a good idea? is there any limit for number of tables?

No, it's a fantastically bad idea.  Please note the caveats in the
partitioning documentation --- the facility is not meant for more than
order-of-a-hundred partitions.  Even if Postgres didn't have issues with
it, your filesystem might get ill with hundreds of thousands of files in
one directory.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Majid Azimi
Дата:
Сообщение: Very Large Table Partitioning
Следующее
От: Mladen Gogala
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Very Large Table Partitioning